Salt In and Salt Out—Where Is the Balance?

Sample image
Sample image
WHERE AND HOW IS SODIUM STORED?

It is now clear that sodium (Na+) is stored in at least four locations:

  1. Osmotically active in the extracellular fluid such as plasma. This is the Na+ concentration that is reported in clinical laboratory results and is normally between 135 to 145 mmol/L.
  2. Inside cells, at a concentration of around 10 mmol/L.
  3. In bones and connective tissue. This compartment shows very little turnover.
  4. In skin and muscle—more specifically, in the room between cells, the so-called interstitial space. This compartment is highly dynamic.


It is the interstitial Na+ storage that has received great attention in the past decade, because it has been associated with important comorbidities, such as hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, inflammation, and insulin resistance.2,3,4,5

In the interstitium, Na+ associates non-osmotically with negatively charged glycosaminoglycan (GAG) via electrostatic interactions. GAGs are unbranched polyanionic polysaccharide chains of variable lengths made up of repeating disaccharide units; each of these disaccharide units carries one to three negatively charged side groups. GAGs are covalently bound to a protein backbone; the combined macromolecule is called proteoglycan. The proteoglycan is part of a "gel" that resides in the interstitial space. GAGs attract Na+ into this interstitial "gel" so that the resulting Na+ concentration may surpass the plasma concentration by 100 mmol/L.6

Originally, it was thought that sodium storage in the skin is a passive process, but recently it became clear that it is regulated by several intricate physiological mechanisms. Studies have shown that high-salt feeding can increase the content of particularly negatively charged GAG species in the skin and thus increase its Na+ binding capacity.7 Also, a high-salt diet increases the osmolarity in the skin, and this is sensed by local immune cells that "patrol" the interstitium, primarily macrophages. In response to increased osmolarity, the vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) is released. VEGF-C is the primary lymphatic vessel growth factor, and its release results in hyperplasia of the lymph capillary network that facilitates Na+ (and chloride) clearance from the interstitium.8

HOW SODIUM DRIVES INFLAMMATION

Tissue Na+ also affects the immune system in several ways.9,10 First, a high-salt diet reduces the activation of innate immune cells that attenuate tissue inflammation. These cells are called alternatively activated (M2) macrophages. The reduced M2 activation may result in a pro-inflammatory response. Second, T-cells exposed to high salt conditions morph into a highly pro-inflammatory autoimmune Th17 phenotype that produces interleukin-17 (IL-17). There is evidence that IL-17 may be involved in the pathogenesis of hypertension. Taken together, these pro-inflammatory transformations may result in an interstitium that is in a chronic inflammatory state, resulting in vascular stiffness, target organ damage, and elevated blood pressure.

THE CATABOLIC EFFECTS OF SODIUM

Sodium loading decreases aldosterone levels and increases the production of cortisol, a steroid hormone. Through a series of steps, these hormonal changes result in an increased production of urea in the liver, whereby some of the substrates required for urea generation come from muscle breakdown. In other words, the increased urea production in the liver occurs at the expense of muscle catabolism. The goal of the increased urea production is to enhance the water retention by the kidneys and avoid excessive water loss following salt intake. In addition, the increased muscle metabolism results in increased water production in liver and muscle mitochondria.11 RRI's hypothesis is that this increased water production in patients with kidney failure may contribute to the hyponatremia seen in some of them.

WHY IS THIS ALL RELEVANT FOR KIDNEY PATIENTS?

Patients with kidney disease, especially those on dialysis, are particularly prone to the untoward effects of salt because they have a reduced ability, or no ability, to excrete salt by their failing kidneys. In patients without residual kidney function, the only way to remove salt is through dialysis. Importantly, hemodialysis can sometimes load the patients with salt, especially in situations where the dialysate sodium concentration exceeds that in the patient's plasma. In addition, patients may receive salt during hemodialysis—e.g., saline used for priming and rinsing or in the event of muscle cramps or hypotension.

Based on physiological reasoning, it is likely ideal that the sodium ingested between hemodialysis sessions should be removed. This goal can be achieved by adjusting the dialysate sodium level in such a way that it parallels the patient's plasma Na+ level using a novel technology called electrolyte balancing control.12,13 This technology measures the conductivity, a proxy of sodium concentration, in the dialysate inlet and outlet streams, and adjusts dialysate inlet concentration so that diffusive sodium loading is avoided (Figure 2). This technology, developed by Fresenius Medical Care, also opens the way to a personalized removal of sodium, for example in patients with high sodium intake or in those with hyponatremia.

FIGURE 2 | The electrolyte balancing control. Conductivity is measured by meters in the dialysate inflow and outflow streams. The data are sent to the central processor unit, where this information is used to calculate the dialysate sodium concentration.

Sample image

A major and fundamental problem is the quantitation of tissue sodium, since the only currently available noninvasive way to do so is by 23Na magnetic resonance imaging (23NaMRI).14,15  23NaMRI scans are only done in a few centers in the United States, are expensive, and are logistically challenging. Because of these limitations, the Renal Research Institute is currently exploring alternative methods, including novel measurement technologies. The vision is to make measurement of skin Na+ available to patients even beyond those on dialysis and to have this information become part of the routine clinical decision-making process.

Meet Our Expert

PETER KOTANKO, MD, FASN
Research Director, Renal Research Institute

Noted researcher and scholar Peter Kotanko heads research initiatives to improve patient outcomes and quality of life. An adjunct professor of medicine and nephrology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City, he has authored and co-authored more than 300 research papers and book chapters, and is the former vice chair of a medical department at an academic teaching hospital in Graz, Austria.

References

  1. Dahlmann A, Dörfelt K, Eicher F, et al. Magnetic resonance-determined sodium removal from tissue stores in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 2015 Feb;87(2):434-41.
  2. Titze J, Luft FC. Speculations on salt and the genesis of arterial hypertension. Kidney Int 2017 Jun;91(6):1324-35.
  3. Schneider MP, Raff U, Kopp C, et al. Skin sodium concentration correlates with left ventricular hypertrophy in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017 Jun;28(6):1867-76.
  4. Kleinewietfeld M, Manzel A, Titze J, et al. Sodium chloride drives autoimmune disease by the induction of pathogenic TH17 cells. Nature 2013 Apr 25;496(7446): 518-22.
  5. Deger SM, Wang P, Fissell R, et al. Tissue sodium accumulation and peripheral insulin sensitivity in maintenance hemodialysis patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2017 Jun;8(3):500-7.
  6. Wiig H, Luft FC, Titze JM. The interstitium conducts extrarenal storage of sodium and represents a third compartment essential for extracellular volume and blood pressure homeostasis. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2018 Mar;222(3). doi: 10.1111/apha.13006.
  7. Ibid.
  8. Machnik A, Neuhofer W, Jantsch J, et al. Macrophages regulate salt-dependent volume and blood pressure by a vascular endothelial growth factor-C-dependent buffering mechanism. Nat Med 2009 May;15(5):545-52.
  9. Kleinewietfeld M, Manzel A, Titze J, et al. Sodium chloride drives autoimmune disease by the induction of pathogenic TH17 cells. Nature 2013 Apr 25;496(7446):518-22.
  10. Wiig H, Schröder A, Neuhofer W, et al. Immune cells control skin lymphatic electrolyte homeostasis and blood pressure. J Clin Invest 2013 Jul;123(7):2803-15.
  11. Kitada K, Daub S, Zhang Y, et al. High salt intake reprioritizes osmolyte and energy metabolism for body fluid conservation. J Clin Invest 2017 May 1;127(5):1944-59.
  12. Kuhlmann U, Maierhofer A, Canaud B, Hoyer J, Gross M. Zero diffusive sodium balance in hemodialysis provided by an algorithm-based electrolyte balancing controller: a proof of principle clinical study. Artif Organs 2019 Feb;43(2):150-8. doi: 10.1111/aor.13328.
  13. Canaud B, Kooman J, Selby NM, et al. Sodium and water handling during hemodialysis: new pathophysiologic insights and management approaches for improving outcomes in end-stage kidney disease. Kidney Int 2019 Feb;95(2):296-309.
  14. Kopp C, Linz P, Dahlmann A, et al. 23Na magnetic resonance imaging-determined tissue sodium in healthy subjects and hypertensive patients. Hypertension 2013 Mar;61(3):635-40.
  15. Dyke JP, Meyring-Wösten A, Zhao Y, et al. Reliability and agreement of sodium (23Na) MRI in calf muscle and skin of healthy subjects from the US. Clin Imaging 2018 Nov-Dec;52:100-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.07.010.